02 December 2006

Windows XP SP3 release date moved to 2007

Windows XP SP3 release date moved to 2007

A story I've been following involves the possible delay of the release of Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3). Without warning or even an official announcement, it appears Microsoft has quietly pushed back the release of Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) to late 2007. This new schedule would place the release at least a year behind the previous schedule, under which XP SP3 was to ship sometime in 2006. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer previously announced that XP SP3 would ship "before" Windows Vista, which is now due in late 2006. (Windows Server 2003 SP2 is still on track for release in the second half of 2006.)

I saw Microsoft's new schedule for XP SP3 in a service pack road map that the company posted to its Web site on December 20, 2005. The company has since changed the Web site and the information is gone. However, you can still see the information I saw, as it appears on Google's cached copy of the site as retrieved on Jan 8, 2006. (See the URL below.) According to the cached page, XP SP3 will ship in the second half of 2007, but it's unclear whether it will include new features. Originally, Microsoft said that XP SP3 would include a collection of previously released bug and security fixes.

Sources at Microsoft told me that the delays are related to the company focusing all of its efforts at getting Vista out the door. Vista is another product that has suffered innumerable delays: The company once expected to ship Vista in 2003.

This isn't the first time Microsoft has delayed an XP service pack, though this new delay is the longest yet. Microsoft postponed the release of XP SP2, originally due in 2003, to 2004, due to a security code review. That event also delayed Vista, then code-named Longhorn.

Update: XP SP3 Still Set for 2007
There was a bit of confusion surrounding yesterday's WinInfo Daily Update. It turns out that Microsoft briefly edited a Web page on its site that contained information about the release date of Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3), now due in late 2007. However, on late Wednesday, Microsoft reloaded the previous version, which contains the late 2007 date. In other words, XP SP3 is still expected in late 2007



Bink.nu is reporting that Microsoft has moved its release date of Windows XP Service Pack 3 from the summer of 2006 to the second half of 2007. This news comes hot off of Microsoft's recent "accident" where it set the Mainstream Support expiration date on the XP Home product as January 1, 2007, and then suspiciously extended the deadline to 2008. Like the support deadline modification, the change to the XP SP3 date is also cagey.

The website questions whether the release date for XP SP3 was stealthily changed by Microsoft. It states that the Microsoft Service Pack Road Map had previously read summer 2006, but now reads, "SP3 for Windows XP Professional is currently planned for 2H 2007." Yet, the publishing date of the Road Map remains unchanged from December 20, 2005.

While the idea that users will have to wait 3 years for a service pack is not desirable, the author of the article ends the post with a humorous mockup headline for 2007: "Microsoft cancels Windows XP SP3, instead comes with roll-up fix." Let's hope that headline stays funny and doesn't become reality.

There are already plenty of reasons why Service Pack 2 is not enough, just look at the WMF scare. Whether it's a roll out of fixes, or something more developed we need Service Pack 3 and we need it now. There were plenty of scares in the last 12 months that need to be addressed with a cleanly installable service pack. Not to mention the hundreds of mb of patches that have to be downloaded after you install SP2. Even for a Broadband user it's painful.

Mark Antony (how's Cleopatra doin'? :-P) - even if MS was big enough to have multiple teams handling stuff, think about it - You COULD split the teams up to do diff things, but you COULD still throw EVERYTHING at Vista in any case. Granted there are diminishing returns to throwing people at a job, but Vista is no small shakes anyway, there must be plenty of places where they could do with more manpower.

Not to forget that vista represents new revenue including upgrade revenue, while "maintenance" gets you no real $$.

No comments:

Google

See other Related Posts below